I agree, this would be quite a nice way to display the memory usage metric, even though it would be a non-traditional/slightly strange way to show it.

That said, PC power users do tend to like having the "option" if given the choice, especially for things like this that aren't typical.

^ I would like to know, as well...   However, seeing as this bug has existed for a while now, Miroslav probably (and understandably, as well) has more urgent kinks to work out in the latest release, so I'm willing to wait a bit for this to be fixed.

Nevertheless, hopefully it will be completed sooner, rather than later, mind you—but I fully trust Miroslav's years of experience and high level of professionalism to prioritise what needs to be done first.

Considering he is the sole developer of by far the MOST useful utility software I have ever used in my 35+ years of using computers, I am highly doubtful that he is just ignoring this issue; rather, he is probably (as I said) just putting this on the backburner.  :-)

P.S. - A good way to tell if he is still working on a feature/support request on this new forum system is the "under review" label after his first reply. I can't think of the exact names of the others off the top of my head, but if you browse the forum a bit, you'll see he labels topics with tags such as "completed", "denied/not actually an issue", etc etc...   Seeing as this one is still "under review", as I said, I'm led to believe (at least I hope) that he hasn't forgot about this yet. 

I'm using the installer version (v5.5.0), on Windows 7 64-Bit.

Regarding your #1 issue, I also have experienced a similar issue regarding deleting registry startup entries for quite a while now (at least for 1 whole version cycle)...  I'm using my iPhone right now, but when I get to my desktop later, I'll try to replicate the error, and report back here with the message.

Thank you, Miroslav, for prioritizing bug fixes over new features (a sign of an experienced and dedicated developer).

While I would like to see this feature implemented (hopefully sooner than later), it's of utmost importance for ANY developer to fix bugs before anything else, so thanks a million!   :-)

This is the the single-most feature I TRULY would like to see added!

If you need beta testers to test out this feature in an upcoming release, please consider posting a beta download link on this support forum (like you used to do on the old support forum). I think that the majority of System Explorer's user-base would definitely use this feature if it was implemented, as it is a very useful one, indeed...

I agree with this suggestion wholeheartedly, and would love to see a fix for this, unless it's something that can only be done on Norton-Symantec's end of development.

I turned off Norton's tamper protection AGES ago, simply due to this conflict between SE and Norton 360, but I really would love to be able to use the "tamper protection" feature. So, if you can do anything to fix this, Miroslav, that would be very much appreciated!

Thanks!