Your comments

Assuming this isn't a spam post, I don't think System Explorer has the capability to automatically measure and monitor for memory leaks (manually, though, yes, you can, and I have actually done so on numerous occasions).

I am curious what you are suggesting/recommending (the category this was posted in is "General: Ideas," after all), so if you could please elaborate on your idea, I am interested. :-)
I can't comment regarding the bug with the Czech localisation, but I also have wanted there to be a constant donate button on the main site for years, now.

I do remember an email conversation a while back with Miroslav, where he said he tends to only put up the donation button from time to time when he's unable to pay the site's web hosting fees.

So (and I do apologise for derailing this bug thread into a donation suggestions one), I know Miroslav invests a heap of his own time into System Explorer, without any payment in return. However, do you think, Miroslav, that you could possibly add a donation button to the front page, so users who want to donate are able to contribute?
I've been a user of System Explorer for several years now (since v1.2 or so) and if memory serves correctly, even the earliest versions of System Explorer's installer were NEVER bundled with adware. My guess is that you downloaded SE from a mirror other than the official systemexplorer.net website (i.e CNET), and those sites sometimes bundle their own adware/spyware into a downloader software for that website. Again, CNET is a perfect example of a download website that does just this.

EDIT: It seems Mistercz typed up a response while I was typing up mine. As you can see—straight from the mouth of the developer himself—SE doesn't include adware in its installer...      Nevertheless, I hope you can figure out the culprit, as I think I can speak for EVERY Internet user when I say that adware is utterly unpleasant.
I agree wholeheartedly; whether on the silent install or even on the default install process, it's quite annoying for my browser to open and temporarily halt my computer (I have a lot of extensions, so opening Chrome from a cold start is irksome) just to let me know that SE has "successfully installed."

Can you at least add a tick box option to the last page of the install window, so that we, the users, can choose whether or not we want to visit the System Explorer homepage?

Thanks a million, and keep up the good work (as you always do), Mistercz!   ;-)
Mistercz could probably answer this more definitively and down to the technical aspects than could I, but I assume that the message you received was due to to the fact that SE accesses certain privileged areas of Windows that your company's firewall aims to make sure don't get altered by malware downloads.

In other words, I'm almost certain you're safe, and that the message you got was just letting you know that SE is able to show information on certain parts of your computer about which your company is just trying to be cautious.

Cheers!

EDIT: After re-reading your original post, it seems that your company is just trying to safeguard against any and all software downloads on corporate machines. So, not that I, personally, doubt the integrity of SE in the least bit, but in case you are unsure of whether or not SE is "safe," try installing various other tools that you know are 100% secure (as in ones you use on your home machine), just to see if you receive the same warning.

Also, just in case I misinterpreted your question in my answer above, as for if there is any "impact" on the installation of SE itself—again, Mistercz would probably be able to answer this better than myself—but I would just try using SE as per you normally would, and see if everything works well without any error messages popping up. If error messages do show up, the easiest "fix" in my opinion would be to just use the portable executable of SE, as (typically) you won't have to worry about any corporate warnings hampering installation, seeing as portable apps don't even require an installation from the get go. However, if you must have the installed version, and if said errors persist during normal usage of SE, then try asking your company's IT rep to ask for a temporary whitelisting so that you can re-install System Explorer. :-)
I'm curious what ideas you have about the "Icons Bar" in SE...   Could you please elaborate in the description, so that we the community (and Mistercz) could discuss your suggestions? 

Thanks!
Yes, you can. Just right click on the process you want, and in the context menu list should be an option that reads something along the lines of "bring to front." 

Note that this option naturally will be present only for processes that have a UI/cmd window (as in not msiexec, services, etc).

Cheers!
@Chris, if I understand correctly what the OP is saying, he does mean "end process," but is just using different terminology (although, I may very well be incorrect regarding my assumption). :-)
Yes, yes, and yes!

This is a feature I've been wanting for quite some time, so @mistercz, please consider adding this to your roadmap.

Thanks, and cheers!
This would be a fantastic feature, indeed!

Typically I use MSI Afterburner when using an application that I know will be GPU-heavy, but if System Explorer could show GPU usage (with an FPS/usage overlay sometime down the line, possibly?) that would mean one less program I need to load up when I play a game, use CAD, or run an Adobe CS app.

Additionally, besides the fact it would be nice to not have to use an additional tool, the fact that GPU usage would always be monitored would be brilliant! This means (among other things) that if there was a piece of software that I wouldn't think would use much or any GPU resources, if it does, I would now know that. In other words, if there was an application that I wouldn't normally think to boot up MSI Afterburner for (in order to monitor GPU usage) I would know that it does actually use my GPU now, because SE can monitor and tell me it.